Home › Forums › RORB – general use › ‘m’ values › Reply To: ‘m’ values
		November 10, 2017 at 8:26 AM
		
		#713
		
		
		
	
Participant
		
		
	Hi,
Thanks for your quick response. Can you please confirm that we should be using m=0.6 for our design runs based on adequate calibration?
Cheers,
Mel
