Home › Forums › RORB – general use › ‘m’ values › Reply To: ‘m’ values
November 10, 2017 at 8:34 AM
#714
Moderator
Hi Mel
Sorry for the confusion – the last sentence in my previous post should have read: “Assuming that you are confident in the results of the model calibration and that the kc value is within a reasonable range, it should be OK to proceed to design runs using an m value of 0.6.”
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 4 months ago by
DavidStephens.